I. Introduction
A. Definition of Senescence: Senescence (or aging) is a persistent
decline in age-specific fitness components of an organism due to
internal physiological deterioration. (From M. R. Rose)
B. Recoginzing senescence
1. A survivorship curve, l(x), plots the probability
that an indivdual is still alive as a function of
age, x:


All
figures, unless otherwise indicated, are from M. R. Rose. 1991.
Evolutionary Biology of Aging. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
II. Genetic Variation for Lifespan
A. Strain Differences
1. Example: Ganetzky and Flanagan. 1978. On the
relationship between senescence and
age-related changes in two wild-type strains of Drosophila melanogaster.
Exp.
Gerontol. 13: 189-196.
1. Example: selection for prolonged lifespan in Drosophila
subobscura (Wattiaux, J. M.
1968. Cumulative parental effects in Drosophila subobscura.
Evolution 22: 406-421.)
III. The Issue
A.. Results of these genetic analyses of senescence raise a fundamental
evolutionary question: if species
harbor genetic variants for which senescence is postponed, why has natural
selection not caused
these variants to become fixed? i.e., why have organisms not evolved
longer life spans?
B. Basic principle (age-intensity principle): the intensity
of selection acting on a trait late in life is expected to be lower than
the intensity of selection acting on a trait expressed early in life.
IV. Age-Intensity of Principle
A. Restatement of the principle
B. Illustration of principle.
C. Intuitive explanation of principle:
a. when a mutation affects survival late in life, most individuals
are dead before the
effects of the allele are expressed, and therefore a beneficial allele
can only increase
the fitness of a small fraction of the individuals that carry it.
b. By contrast, when a mutation affects survival early in life, most
individuals carrying
the mutant allele are alive when the allele is expressed and thus benefit
from having
that allele.
V. Evolutionary Theories of Senescence
A. Two general theoretical explanations for the evolution of senescence:
1. Antagonistic pleiotropy theory
2. Mutation acumulation theory
B. Antagonistic pleiotropy theory (Due to Medawar and Williams)
1. Explanation
2. Experimental evidence for antagonistic pleiotropy--genetic correlations
(Rose and Charlesworth. 1981. Genetics 97: 173-186.)
3. Experimental evidence for antagonisitc pleiotropy--selection experiments
( Rose. 1984. Evolution 38: 1004-1010.)
C. Mutation acumulation theory. (Due to Medawar)
1. Explanation
2. Evidence for mutation accumulation: increased genetic variation
in age-specific fitness with
age. (Rose and Charlesworth 1981.)
3. Experimental evidence for mutation accumulation: selection experiments.
a. Logic and protocol of the experiment:
b. Example: Mueller, L. D. 1987. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 84: 1974-1977.
D. Conclusions
1. Analysis of genetic variation for senescence in Drosophila
indicates that both antagonistic
pleiotropy and mutation accumulation contribute to senescence.
2. Little information is available for other oragnisms.
IV. Implications of Evolutionary Theories of Senescence
A. The major cause of senescence is the decreasing strength of selection
as organisms age, which allows
mutations causing reduced late fitness to increase in frequency or even
become fixed. (Note that this
is true regardless of whether antagonistic pleiotropy or mutation accumulation
applies.)
B. Implies that there will be no "general cause" of senescence that
acts across species, or even across
populations.
1. In any species or population the exact causes of senescence will
depend on what mutations
having deleterious effects on late fitness increase in frequency, and what
characters those
mutations affect.
2. Also implies that senescence in a particular organism may have
multiple causes, representing
different characters affected by different deleterious mutations contributing
to senescence.
C. Suggests that studying the "cause" of senescence in non-human
animals will not be informative
directly about the causes of senescence in humans, and thus will not provide
direct information on
the types of medical intervention that will be needed to eliminate senescence
in humans.
D. Nevertheless, exploration of the causes of senescence in other
organisms may indirectly benefit
research in human gerontology by leading to the development of a robust
research protocol that
can be applied to the study of human senescence.
E. Hope for a "magic bullet" cure of senescence, however, are slim,
because evolutionary considerations
suggest that once a cure is developed for one senescence factor and lifespan
is extended somewhat,
other senescence factors will kick in to limit lifespan.