Effects of a 4-year exposure to pre-industrial and elevated CO2 gradient on stomatal characters of C3 and C4 species

Chantal D. Reid1, Hafiz Maherali1, Robert B. Jackson1, Hyrum B. Johnson2, and H. Wayne Polley2

1Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA 27708; 2USDA/ARS Grassland, Soil, and Water Research Laboratory, Temple TX

 

Abstract

Many studies report that past increase in atmospheric [CO2] are associated with reduced stomatal density (SD). However, many of these studies are based on paleofossils or herbarium specimens where other environmental factors may affect stomatal distribution. To understand the effect of CO2 on stomatal distribution, we examined 9 grassland species after 4 years of growth in the field under an experimental gradient of CO2 ranging from pre-industrial to elevated concentrations (200 to 550 µmol CO2 mol-1). In the field, casts were made on leaves of C3 and C4 annual and perennial grasses and forbs. Leaf impressions were made from the casts and SD, stomatal index (SI), and stomatal aperture length (AP) were measured. Individually, the C4 grasses showed no strong negative linear relationship between SD and [CO2], SI and [CO2], or AP and [CO2]. In contrast, C3 annuals showed strong positive and negative linear relationships between SD and [CO2] or SI and [CO2]. One C3 perennial, Solanum dimidiatum, had a strong positive linear relationship between SD and [CO2] that was associated with a negative relationship between AP and [CO2]. In all species, AP either decreased or was unchanged by [CO2]. These stomatal parameters show no effect of CO2 on C4 grasses but different responses on C3 species, suggesting limited use of preserved material as [CO2] proxy. Also, C3 plants respond to CO2 by adjusting stomatal cell initiation, epidermal cell expansion, or both.

Objective

Determine the long-term effects of CO2 on the stomatal frequency of different species grown along a gradient of pre-industrial to projected future CO2.

Experimental design

  • Full-sun mature leaves from 9 species were sampled for stomatal frequencies.
    • 3 C3 Annuals: Bromus japonicus (BR), Croton monanthogynous (CM), Euphorbia bicolor (Eubi)
    • 3 C3 Perennials: Convovulus equitans (CoEq), Solanum dimidiatum (SD), Solidago canadensis (SC)
    • 3 C4 Perennials: Bothriochloa ischaemum (KR), Paspalum pubescens (Ppa), Sorghum halepense (Sha)
    • Species were sampled at different periods according to their phenology
    • Individual leaf area estimated from leaf length and width.
  • Stomatal impressions:
    • Casts of the leaves were made in the field using dental impression material (Kerr Extrude-Medium).
    • Leaf impressions were made from clear nail polish peels of the cast.
    • Number and length of stomata, and number of epidermal cells were recorded under a light microscope hooked up to a computer imaging system.
  • Stomatal frequency calculated by:
    • Stomatal density (SD) = # stomata mm-2
    • Epidermal cell counts (ECD) = # epidermal cells mm-2
    • Stomatal index (SI) = [SD / (SD+ECD)] *100

Hypothesis

Stomatal frequency decreases with increasing atmospheric [CO2]

‘An old hypothesis revisited’

  • Körner et al. (1986) observed changes in stomatal density with changing pCO2 in altitudinal gradients.
  • Woodward’s (1987) seminal paper reported a decrease in stomatal density with increasing CO2 from pre-industrial to current levels.

But

  • Evidence from elevated CO2 experiments does not always support it.
  • Evidence from natural CO2 vents gives variable support (Bettarini et al. 1998).
  • Our earlier research with multi-generations of Arabidopsis at different CO2 did not support it.
     
  • Yet, the hypothesis is now used to reconstruct past CO2 environments from paleofossils (McElwain et al. 1999)
  • As stomatal characters are a main determinant of water use and are correlated with plant tolerance to pollutants, such understanding will help predict water use in future environments and guide breeding efforts for increased pollutant tolerance.

 

Field chambers on a C3/C4 grassland in Temple, TX

  • Two tunnel-shaped field chambers
    • A 560 to 350 µmol CO2 mol -1 tunnel
    • A 365 to 200 µmol CO2 mol -1 tunnel
  • Gradients of CO2 are driven by daytime photosynthesis and nighttime respiration (Johnson et al. 2000)

 

Tunnel sections controlled at different CO2 levels

  • Air flow is adjusted to maintain preset [CO2]
  • Watering is adjusted to simulate rainfall outside
  • Sealed slits are used to sample with mimimum disturbance

 

Leaf impressions at 400x

S. dimidiatum grown at at 215 µmol CO2 mol -1S. dimidiatum grown at at 550 µmol CO2 mol -1

Table 1:
Effects of atmospheric CO2 and individual leaf area (LA) on stomatal density (SD), index (SI), and aperture length (AP) on functional groups of a C3-C4 grassland after a 4-year exposure to a CO2 gradient.

C3
Annuals

C3
Perennials

C4
Perennials

Sloper2Sloper2Sloper2
CO2
SD-1.240.50**––NS+0.140.07*
SI+0.160.48**––NS––NS
AP+0.020.07*-0.020.14***––NS
LA
SD-34.90.58***+0.260.17*+1.320.55***
AP-3.950.04*––NS+0.460.07**

In the long-term, is the observed decline in leaf conductance in this grassland system caused by a change in leaf anatomy?
In plants exposed to several years of different atmospheric CO2, is the stomatal frequency altered?

 

Conclusions

  • From pre-industrial to elevated CO2, only 2 of 9 species had a significant decrease in SD and 1 of 9 species had a significant decrease in SI, in contrast to our hypothesis.
  • Two of the 9 species, B. japonicus and S. dimidiatum, had a significant increase in SD. For S. dimidiatum, the increase in SD was compensated by a decrease in the size of the stomata.
  • Stomatal size is decreased with increased CO2 suggesting that the reduction in leaf conductance is by a combination of change in frequency, anatomy and function.

 

References

Anderson LJ, Maherali H, Johnson HB, Polley HW, Jackson RB. 2001. Glob. Ch Biol. In press.
Bettarini I, Vaccari FP, Miglietta F. 1998. Glob. Ch Biol. 4: 17-22.
Johnson HB, Polley HW, Whitis RP. 2000. Funct. Ecol. 14: 388-396.
Körner Ch, Bannister P, Mark AF. 1986. Oecologia 69: 577-588.
Maherali H, Reid CD, Polley HW, Jphnson HB, Jackson RB. 2001. Plant Cell Environ. (submitted)
McElwain JC, Beerling DJ, Woodward FI. 1999. Science 285: 1386-1390.
Woodward FI. 1987. Nature 327: 617-618.

Acknowledgements

 

This poster was presented at the 2001 Ecological Socierty of America meeting.

Current Projects | Jackson Lab home

Last modified 8 October 2001.