Home > Collections > Cryptogams > Bryophytes

Collections & databases

Library

People

Projects

Outreach

Volunteer opportunities

Contact

 

Bryophytes

Bryophyte Herbarium Phone: (919) 660-7300
Biology Department FAX: (919) 660-7293

The bryophyte herbarium includes approximately 230,000 specimens, of which some 160,000 are mosses. With about 50,000 moss collections from the southeastern United States, the DUKE collection is one of, if not the most important, resource for documenting the southeastern moss flora. This flora is very rich, with approximately 48% of the moss species and 55% of the genera that are recorded from all of North America. Almost 130,000 specimen records can be searched online. >>>Catalog of Bryophytes <<<

In recognition of Lewis E. Anderson's contributions, the bryophyte herbarium was formally named the L.E. Anderson Bryophyte Herbarium in November, 1998.

Important collections of bryophytes include those of L.E. Anderson, H.L. Blomquist, M. Crosby, A.J. Grout, B.D. Mishler, W.B. Schofield, R. Schuster, A.J. Shaw, and 48 bryophyte exsiccati collections.

The DUKE bryophyte collection has been and is being actively utilized by members of the bryological community for the Bryophyte Flora of North America Project (BFNA).

Link to Duke Bryology Laboratory

History of the L.E. Anderson Bryophyte Herbarium

Bryology at Duke was initiated by the late Professor H. L. Blomquist, who came to Duke (then Trinity College) in 1921. Professor Blomquist received his Ph.D. degree from the University of Chicago. His dissertation work involved developmental studies on the fern, Dicksonia, under the supervision of W.J.G. Land, the noted morphologist. While at Chicago, Blomquist came under the influence of its strong morphology tradition. His teachers included the notable botanists Coulter, Chamberlain, Cowles, and the young physiologist, Charles R. Barnes. Barnes published the first keys to the mosses of North America, based on the Lesquereux and James manual. There was no taxonomy at Chicago in those days, and Blomquist had no formal taxonomic training. He came to Duke as a morphologist. He had a fundamental knowledge of bryophyte morphology , however, and introduced a course called Morphology of Bryophytes and Ferns. Blomquist had little knowledge of bryophytes in the field and was fascinated to find mosses and hepatics that he has seen only in preservatives and slides. He therefore began to collect. He had no concept of an herbarium and no experience in collecting and preparing specimens. He joined the Sullivant Moss Society (now the American Bryological and Lichenological Society) and soon began correspondence with George Conklin, George B. Kaiser, A.J. Grout, A.L. Andrews, and Alexander W. Evans, all of whom identified specimens for him and provided information on how to prepare and packet specimens. Thus, the early 1920’s saw the beginning of the bryophyte herbarium at Duke; a shoebox of mosses casually placed on a shelf.

Blomquist was a generalist. He was interested in all groups of plants. His shift from morphology to taxonomy occurred when he met an amateur botanist and plant collector from Winston-Salem, North Carolina, P.O. Schallert. Schallert was a physician by profession, but collected all groups of plants. He was an avid collector with a good eye for the unusual, but he was a bad influence for an impressionable Blomquist. Schallert, who collected in huge quantities and whose specimens are distributed all over the world, was careless in his collecting and processing habits. Consequently, the locality data for Schallert’s own collections are not always trustworthy. His mis-labeled specimens have produced some odd distributional anomalies.

In 1930, Schallert sold his entire herbarium, consisting of 16,000 specimens, to Duke University. About 4000 of these were bryophytes, lichens, and algae. There is not an exact inventory of the number of bryophytes, but we estimate about 3,000. Schallert exchanged widely, and many of these exchanged specimens are excellent: reliably labeled and accurately determined. Schallert’s herbarium and Blomquist’s early collections thus formed a small nucleus around which the Duke herbarium grew and diversified.

Professor Henry J. Oosting joined the Department of Botany at Duke in 1932 as a plant ecologist and began a research program in vegetation analysis. Desperately needing a working herbarium for his vascular plant studies, he volunteered to serve as curator of the entire collection. Oosting had excellent training in systematics, first at Michigan State University, under Darlington, and with Rosendahl and Butters at the University of Minnesota, where he studied ecology with Cooper. It was Oosting’s interests and energies that organized and guided the Duke herbarium into a working facility. All the Schallert bryophytes were repacketed and mounted on sheets, with the packets geographically segregated.

Lewis and Pam AndersonIn 1936, Lewis E. Anderson was added to the Botany faculty to teach and develop a research program in cytology. Earlier, Anderson had developed a side interest in mosses during a portion of a summer in the Ozarkian Highlands of Arkansas. This interest was heightened when he took Blomquist’s course on mosses and ferns as a Master’s Candidate at Duke in 1931, and during two summers that he spent with Blomquist in the Southern Appalachian Mountains. Anderson was given the responsibility of curating the moss herbarium. He retained these duties until he retired in 1982. Gradually, Anderson’s research interests shifted from cytology of cell organelles to the systematics, ecology, and cytogenetics of mosses. The culmination of his interests in the moss flora of Eastern North America was his monumental, two-volume flora, published in 1981 (in collaboration with Howard Crum; see Crum, H.A. & L.E. Anderson, Mosses of Eastern North America, Columbia University Press, New York, 1981). A considerable amount of Anderson’s energies went into the expansion and development of the bryophyte herbarium, disproportionately concentrated on mosses, and to the acquisition of a bryophyte herbarium. Eventually, a graduate program in bryology was established and a course in bryology was offered, emphasizing field studies (a tradition that continues today).

Anderson’s successor, Brent D. Mishler, arrived at Duke in 1984. Mishler occupied the position of Assistant, then Associate Professor of Botany, and Curator of the bryophyte herbarium, until he left for the University of California at Berkeley in 1993. Mishler is now Professor and Director of the University and Jepson Herbaria at Berkeley. During his stay at Duke, Mishler was active in phylogenetic studies on bryophytes, development of systematic theory, and taxonomy of the moss genus, Tortula. While at Duke, Mishler gathered information about the history of bryology at Duke from which the summary provided above was derived.

Jonathan Shaw joined Duke’s Botany Department as Associate Professor and Curator of Bryophytes in 1996. Shaw’s research interests include the reproductive biology and population genetics of mosses, phylogenetic studies utilizing nuclear, chloroplast and mitochondrial DNA, and the application of DNA sequence data to evolutionary questions at and below the species-level. Shaw gave his bryophyte herbarium, especially rich in collections of the Bryaceae, to Duke when he came in 1996. He has a strong commitment to collections-based research.

<-- Top

Bryophyte exsiccati collections housed in the DUKE herbarium

AUTHOR DATES TITLE
Allen 1986 - Fontinalaceae Exsiccatae
Allen and Pursell1999 - Maine Mosses
Andrus and Vitt1975 - 1982Sphagnotheca Boreali-Americana
Austin 1870 - 1878Musci Appalachiani
Bednarek-Ochyra 1987 Bryophyta Svalbardensia Exsiccata
Brassard 1978 - 1988Bryophyta Exsiccata Terrae-Novae et Labradoricae
Brotherus 1910 - 1916 Bryotheca Fennica
Churchill and Eckel 1987 - Musci Planitiebus Incolae Exsiccati
Crum and Anderson1980 - Mosses of North America
De Sloover 1975 - 1993 Herbier Bryologique
Drummond1841Musci Americani
Eaton and Faxon1896 Sphagna Boreali-Americana Exsiccata
Frahm1986 - 1991 Bryophyta Vogesiaca Exsiccata
Frahm 1991 Campylopodes Centrali-Africanae
Frahm1981 - 1992 Campylopodes Exsiccatae
Frahm 1987 Campylopodes Malaysiae Exsiccatae
Frahm 1985 Campylopodes Peruvianae Exsiccatae
Gradstein 1984 - 1990 Bryophyta Neotropica Exsiccata
Grout 1925 - 1945 North American Musci Perfecti
Grout 1931 - 1942 North American Musci Pleurocarpi
Hattori 1946 - 1960 Hepaticae Japonicae Exsiccatae
Holmen 1951 - 1959 Bryophyta Danica Exsiccata
Holzinger 1904 - 1929 Musci Acrocarpi Boreali-Americani et Europaei
Horton 1978 Encalyptaceae Americanae Exsiccatae
Husnot 1870 - 1907 Musci Galliae
Inoue 1970 - 1989 Bryophyta Selecta Exsiccata
Iwatsuki 1980 Fissidentaceae Asiaticae Exsiccatae
Iwatsuki and Mizutani 1977 - 1983 Bryophyta Exsiccata
Jedrzejko and Zarnowiec 1982 - 1984 Musci Macroregioni Meridionale Poloniae Exsiccati
Jedrzejko, Klama and Zarnowiec 1982 - 1984 Hepaticae Macroregioni Meridionali Poloniae Exsiccati
Lin 1981 Bryophytes of Taiwan
Lisowski 1954 - 1966 Bryotheca Polonica
Lisowski 1979 Musci ex Montibus Vranica Bosnia
Matteri 1986 Musci Fuegiani Exsiccati
Matteri1990 Musci Patagonia Exsiccati
Noguchi and Hattori 1947 - 1983 Musci Japonici Exsiccati
Ochyra 1984 - 1987 Musci Poloniae Exsiccati
Piippo 1993 - 1997 Hepaticae Exsiccatae S.O. Lindbergii
Rabenhorst and Gottsche 1855 - 1879 Hepaticae Europaeae
Redfearn, Allen and Magill 1996 - Mosses of the Interior Highlands
Renauld and Cardot 1902 - 1908 Musci Europaei Exsiccati
Savicz-Ljubitzkaja 1957 - 1962 Hepatica et Musci URSS Exsiccati
Schofield 1969 - Bryophyta Canadensis
Small 1897 - 1905 Mosses of the Southern United States
Small 1907 Hepatics of Eastern North America
Steere and Holmen 1975 - 1976 Bryophyta Arctica Exsiccata
Suzuki 1983 Sphagnotheca Japonica
Vitt 1980 - 1992 Orthotrichaceae Boreali-Americanae Exsiccatae

<-- Top

COLLECTIONS | Vascular Plants | Algae | Bryophytes | Fungi | Lichens

2007 Duke University Herbarium, Durham, NC 27708 USA. We welcome your feedback and suggestions.
Duke University | Department of Biology

counter