Ten million years prior to the Industrial Revolution,
mean atmospheric CO2 averaged 0.02% of Earth's atmosphere.
Two million years prior to industrialization concentrations ranged from
200 ppm to 280. One thousand years prior to 1850, levels remained steady
at 280 ppm. By 1996, roughly 150 years post-industrial revolution, that
percentage had risen to 358 ppm. Today, carbon dioxide constitutes 0.037%
of the atmosphere and is increasing at an annually increasing rate of
1.8 ppm. This translates into a 30% increase in atmospheric CO2
since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution. Anthropogenic forcing
such as coal, oil and gas combustion and deforestation are responsible
for this unprecedented increase (Fig. 1).
Since CO2 is a greenhouse gas, its excess in the atmosphere
has been strongly implicated in global warming.
Figure 1: CO2 levels as function
of time and latitude

Annual per capita emission rates vary from country
to country according to climate, degree of industrialization, energy
taxes, population size and the manner in which electricity is generated.
With these factors taken into consideration, the United States emits
the greatest amount of CO2 at 1350 million metric tons per
year. Russia by contrast, the worlds largest country yet not as densely
populated as the U.S., emits approximately 950 million metric tons annually.country
yet not densely populated emits approximately 950 million metric tons
annually. (Fig 2)
The global disparity in annual emissions is
most apparent between developed countries and developing ones. In 1985
for example, per capita emissions for the developed world measured more
than five times those of the developing world. (Bongaarts).
While an increase in global population over the next century may decrease
per capita emissions rates, the gross annual emissions are projected
to increase. In his study on the link between population growth and
global warming, John Bongaarts puts forth a model predicting a 35% increase
in emissions from 1985 to 2100.
Of particular interest is the impact
of these emissions on the global carbon cycle.
The cycle can be described in terms of carbon sources and sinks that
when summed together yield an increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide
levels. Sources of carbon dioxide include deforestation and fossil fuels
while sinks include the ocean and a currently unidentified terrestrial
sink. (Schlesinger 1991).
Atmospheric increase = Fossil fuel emissions
+ Net emissions from land use - Oceanic uptake - Missing terrestrial
C sink
Figure 3: The global Carbon cycle
Of the 7 billion tons of carbon annually forced
around the globe, approximately 3 billion tons perpetuate in the atmosphere
while the ocean sucks down another 2 billion tons. Scientists believe
vegetation incorporate the remaining carbon, ultimately passing it to
soil in modified forms. However, the exact amount absorbed and location
of the sink are yet to be determined. Currently, scientists are studying
the North American Boreal forest above of 40° N latitude.
That carbon exists in two stable isotopic forms
12C, 13C, is particularly useful in studying this
cycling of carbon throughout the atmosphere. Seasonal fluctations in
atmospheric CO2 can be tracked using 13C to study
the effects of anthropogenic forcing. Research has shown that plants
sequester CO2 at a greater rate under elevated atmospheric
CO2. This translates into atmospheric enrichment in the heavier 13C
while plants exhibit 13C depletion.
It's important to note that atmospheric CO2
levels over land fluctuate on diurnal, seasonal, and latitudinal scales.
The 358 ppm mentioned above represents an annual average. At the diurnal
level, local atmospheric CO2 drops during the day when vegetation
actively photosynthesizes. The reverse occurs at night as vegetation
undergoes respiration instead. d13C,
notation used to describe 13C/12C, also fluctuates diurnally, yielding
information about relative 13C levels. (The leaf
level section explains) this in further detail.
Seasonally, vegetation, and hence photosynthesis,
abounds in summer hemispheres. During this time, atmospheric CO2
levels decrease yielding a greater relative concentration of atmospheric
13C. The opposite is true in winter hemispheres. Seasonal levels are
a strong function of latitude as more vegetation exists in warmer latitudes.
But what about the increased atmospheric carbon
dioxide from fossil fuels? How does this change the 13C/12C ratio? Roeloffzen
et. al 1990 analyzed air samples from 7 different stations situated
in the Pacific area in an attempt to answer these questions. For all
of the sites in question, the researchers noticed an overall decrease
iin d13C, meaning higher 12C.
This results from the distinct d13C
signature of fossil fuels of -27.28 (See leaf level
for an explanation)
Figure 4: Trends and seasonal components of d13C
at Mauna Loa and Line Islands (Roeloffzen et. al
1990)

From the data from the seven stations, Roeloffzen
et. al 1990 constructed time evolutions of global CO2 and d13C
levels from 1981-1989 across latitudes. Since 95% of fossil
fuel emissions originate in the Northern hemisphere, higher C values
and more negative d13C
were observed there:
