| "Chop." The cheapest and easiest method is
cutting down trees and measuring on the ground, or collecting fallen
leaves and branches. This method doesn't allow temporal sampling,
doesn't preserve leaf angles, breaks many units beyond reconstruction,
and has numerous other problems. |

Photo credit:
http://www.firelab.org/fep/research/canopy
|
| "Climb." Up the trunk with belts or ascenders
or ladders, or up to the branches with single
rope techniques (SRT) (e.g. Perry 1978,
reviewed in Moffett 1993). These methods
are relatively cheap, but are slow, require skill, and are very limited
in spatial extent. |

Photo credit: http://www.selby.org/research/canopy |
|
"Build." A tower provides access to a small area of canopy
over a range of heights. A ladder to climb and a series of walkways
(e.g. Muul and Liat 1970) supported
by the trees themselves provides wider access, but this approach
is expensive and requires numerous safety precautions. Canopy booms
have been constructed that attach to trees on one end and have a
canvas chair suspended from the other.
|

Photo credit: http://www.selby.org/research/canopy |
| "Float." Hot air balloons and inflatable rafts
have been used to sample the very top of the canopy successfully,
even in remote areas that can't easily be reached on the ground (Hallé
1990). |

Photo credit: http://www.selby.org/research/canopy |
| "Spend." If money isn't an issue, the construction
industry provides equipment such as cherry pickers, which move easily
in relatively open forest or along roads, and construction cranes,
which can cover a huge area completely and sample from any point in
the x, y, or z direction - but are very expensive (reviewed in Parker
et al. 1992). |

Photo credit: http://depts.washington.edu/wrccrf/gallery |